History repeats itself in every nation and everywhere. No country is liberated with a peace treaty signature, this is considered as hypocrisy. But true liberation comes only by giving blood because what is taken by force is returned by force.

Today Bush is giving a speech to the air force officers in Colorado, saying that “this guerilla warfare in Iraq and Afghanistan has made the understanding of victory more complicated“. And he is quite right because the untied states army is not qualified to handle wars in cities or jungles. They are qualified to handle wars on their soil or in the desert. They have lost the war against Vietnam although they have occupied Vietnam but they withdrew after 13 years. Vietnam to the knowledge of the entire world was a bloody nightmare for the Americans, even General Myers confessed saying that every day he dreams of a nightmare seeing the letter “V” with drops of blood falling on him.

They are not qualified for guerilla warfare in cities for a number of reasons, An army in general is trained to maintain peace and defend the country against any attacks. Many of the united states army (mercenaries from Latina America, southeast Asia, Caucasian countries) have been given basic training so they can immediately join the Iraqi war. They have not attended military school, they are mercenaries given promises to be given the green card and the American nationality, and since they have not been trained very well and thrown immediately in an unfamiliar territory that their enemy knows well and perfection; they will obviously lose the battle, but what is making them resist somehow is the high equipment technology weapons they have.

They have lost in Vietnam because they were not familiar with guerilla warfare in jungles because they have not been exposed to training in the jungle, and the same thing has happened; they started recruiting mercenaries in the 70’s and throwing them into Vietnam after promises. The Americans were hunted in Vietnam because the Vietnamese knew their land more than any body else and knew how to make traps and hide. they used the policy of hit and run.

Guerilla warfare has been not only a nightmare but a phobia to the united states army. And only after a high number of causalities and financial losses we hear protests and critics from within the American administration and white house such as Scott Maclilan. Maclilan said that it is the biggest strategic mistake to have a war against Iraq and It was totally unnecessary. But if it were the other way around, no causalities, no financial losses, no military artillery losses, and more monetary benefits from the Iraqi wells, American oil companies are having high cash flow and profit; I would doubt if any one from the white house will criticize or protest against the war against Iraq.

One thing I am sure of, in my personal opinion; the Americans won’t last in Iraq for 8 years ahead. Plus Vietnam would be considered as a picnic. Because in Vietnam you had only locals attacking the united states army. But in Iraq you have many sects plus you have Arabs being smuggled only to attack the united states army in Iraq. Iraq has been a model of personal vendettas because any country or group that are not on good terms with the united states would go to Iraq to settle the accounts.

The withdrawal from Iraq is tied to a number of things in the gulf region such as Iran and the civil war in Iraq that is already knocking the doors but that would be written in an article next week.

The Bath party managed to control this multi sect country for 2 reasons. The Bath party is a socialist party and it included ALL country sects in its organizational structure. From the characters I know, Sadoun Hommadi is a Shiite and he held the prime minister position for sometime, minister of foreign affairs once, the head of the revolutionary parliament 3 times, minister of agriculture once and minister of the media and culture once. The Sahaf held the position of minister of media once, minister of foreign affairs once and minister of agriculture once and a number of positions that I am not exactly sure of. 2 of the vice presidents were Kurds. One was a Sunni Kurd Taha Yassin Ramadan, and one was a Shiite Kurd Taha Mohyi Aldeen Marouf. Tarek Azziz a Christian catholic took the positions of almost all the ministers and the most famous positions he held were the prime minister and minister of foreign affairs for almost a decade. In short, every member of the parliament had the chance to hold the position of all ministers. The Baath party looked at Iraqis as Iraqis only and refused to look at them as a number of sects.

It would astonish many of you to know that the 55 list of wanted men in the Baath regime that the united states published their names on a form of playing cards; 38 of them were between Kurds and Shiite and the rest are Sunnis and Christians. We have here a party that controls the country with a solid grip and it involves all sects. And that is how Iraq was united before the occupation. That is a solution that the Americans know of but they tend to turn a blind eye on it because the more the country is in chaos the more it serves in the united states best interests. And it is a mistake to think that the soldiers being killed are Americans, most of them are mercenaries that are promised to be given the green card and American nationality and the united states collects these mercenaries from Latin America, Caucasian countries, Arab countries and Southeast Asian. The more chaos the more the Americans financially benefit and the more the American companies are given the priority to establish businesses in Iraq.

In order to unite Iraq again, a number of steps must be taken and these steps will not be achieved unless the Iraqis give blood in return. First is liberation, the Americans as occupiers must leave the country along with the other countries taking with them their puppies, and I suppose we all know what these puppies are doing. How can these puppies know how to operate a country like this since all of them without exception hold nationalities other than Iraqi and have been away from the country for at least 30 years? Second, there should be one party that involves all the Iraqi sects as members in it and the election of party members should be under the supervision of the united nations making sure no interferences from any ambassador or the forging of the results and also making sure that the Americans and the Israelis do not pay money so that a preferred politician will win the elections and later on serve as their puppy. Third, the united states and all countries that participated in the occupation should compensate that new government for the damage they have caused over a decade.

What is making the killing, bloodshed, personal vendettas in Iraq is simply the fact that country is NOT under control. And it is deliberately left Uncontrolled. The Americans welcome as much political parties as possible because that makes the country’s segregation easier which serves in the united states best interest. And we have almost all the parties that are based on sectarian background. From the Sunni sect we got many, we got an Islamic party, a communist party and a socialist party. from the Shiites we got 2 Islamic parties that are not on good terms and have a history of blood, one of them is Persian decedent and one is Iraq decedent, the Badr militia and the Sadr militia. From the Kurds we have 2 parties that have a very long bloody history since the 70’s. from the Turkmans we also have a number of parties. And all the other sects have parties that are not very active in Iraqi and in the media. At least these are the parties I am aware of not to mention the rest that I have no knowledge of.

At this time Iraq is very qualified to be segregated because the Americans opened the way for such events, and it is precisely because they follow the Machiavellian saying “segregate and rule”. I mean in every day life if you divide everything it will be easier for you to maintain and control and not to treat one thing as a huge item. If the Iraqis wont wake up to oust the occupiers then they will not only shower but they will drawn in a blood bath (civil war) that if we wanted to compare in the future between the Iraqi blood bath and the Lebanese and the Rwandan civil war, these will be considered as picnics in comparison to Iraqis because Iraqis are aggressive by nature and they are hard to maintain, control and handle. and their bloody history proves that since the time of Adam.

Al-Hussain from the State of Qatar

http://aay-quotes.blogspot.com

Many of us think that the first war between the two countries was the first gulf war. And that is incorrect information. The history goes back even before the Persian empire, if any of you read the history between the two countries; you will see that approximately every 100 years one of the two takes over the other. Unfortunately it seems that now it is the Persian’s time to take over Mesopotamia.

Reasons to war, occupation and colonization have been changed through the history. A thousand years ago they were reasons to expand an empire, search water, good land to harvest or the desire to have a strategic geographical location. But nowadays reasons for war are different. In the coming decade Iran will be out of oil and will rely on its gas that will eventually finish and it needs a source of energy to maintain and operate its ships, factories, nuclear submarine and its nuclear reactors. Therefore as skilled and very well practiced politicians; the Iranian administration has its eye on the Iraqi wells as a major objective, and to put its hands on the eastern gate to the Arab countries (Iraq) and eventually expanding and spreading the Shia mazhab.

The Persian-American struggle and the Persian-Israeli struggle is pure fake and forged. They are not enemies on the contrary they are allies. Think of it this way; two friends have their eyes on a girl and not necessarily they should be enemies. The history of the Iranian-Israeli relationships has its roots to the times of the Shah Riza Pahlavi. The Shah met a good number of Israelis in Tehran and the meetings were managed by members of the Iraqi Kurds militia at the time only to provide and exchange classified information about Iraq and how can they change the regime, giving the Kurds independence, and funding the Kurds. The Kurds were both funded by the Iranians and by the Israelis.

It is an American, Persian and Zionist conspiracy on Iraq. Iraq has been a complicated mix of Intelligence agencies. We can find the Israeli (Mossad) that operates its offices all over Iraq mainly in the Kurdish area and in the far South , we can find Turkish, Jordanian, Iranian, American C.I.A, the British MI6, Saudi, Syrian and the list goes on. It has become not only a complicated mixture but a field of personal vendetta. and that fields fits perfectly well for vendettas because Iraq is a country with many ethnic groups.

The intelligence agencies do not have to do the dirty work themselves, they simply have followers from these ethnic groups doing their dirty job for them. And it is no secret even if Iran denies it, that Iran is funding the Sadr Militia and the Badr Militia and smuggling them weapons that are Iranian made. The ministry of defence, ministry of health and the ministry of interior are administered by the Iranians in Iraq. And the Americans know that very well but they tend to keep a blind eye on it.

The Iranian Intelligence agency in Iraq has lists of very skilled Iraqi Doctors, Lawyers, Scientists, Engineers, Teachers...etc. That are being killed on a daily basis or given a choice to leave the country. Iran wants to return Iraq to the era of ignorance. Just like colonization, leaving the people not understanding and not having knowledge what is going on in their country while the colonizer is achieving his personal interests and goals without the need of getting into trouble facing some rebellions and protests.

I assume we do all agree that Iran and the United States are both committing crimes against humanity in Iraq. And there is something going on that I don’t think many of you are recognizing. And that is; when ever the United States experiences a high number of causalities in soldiers and artillery you will immediately find on the news the topic of Iran’s nuclear program. You will find the United States threatening, the EU is not pleased, and they are making a meeting to impose sanctions. And when ever the united States is somehow relaxed in Iraq, you will find them welcoming the Iranian statements in the media, the EU is pleased with the negotiations and so on. You can consider this as a scale.

The scenario that I can see clearly is that when ever the United States wishes to withdraw from Iraq, it will put all the killings that have been made since the beginning of the occupation; will put them all in the Iranian pocket saying that all these crimes Iran has committed in Iraq and that we (USA) came to free the Iraqi people. We both know that both countries are committing crimes on a daily basis.

What freedom and liberation are they talking about? Governments nowadays lie and lie to their people until they believe them and go to war, this is very ridiculous. the United Nations documented files stating that during the 35 years of the rule of President Saddam Hussein; only 350 thousand Iraqis have been killed. And the United States officially announced that 1,209,000 Iraqis have been killed since the end of the war which means during 5 years. Not counting the Iraqis have been killed during the war and during the embargo on Iraq that killed 1,000,000 Iraqi children due to diseases of all kinds mainly cancer. The History of both countries is packed with blood. The united states was established on the basis of the blood of millions of Red Indians.

What a huge gap; between 1,209,000 in 5 years and 350,000 in 35 years. What kind of liberation is that? I think the Americans have a different meaning of liberation other than the universal one we all know.

The United States will not invade Iran nor it will strike Iran for a number of reasons. First it is not capable of engaging itself in a third war in the same region. Second its losing billions of dollars rather than gaining from the Iraqi oil. Third, to secure the Gulf countries from an Iranian reply to their Strike. So the coming Scenario in my opinion is to change the Iranian Regime from the inside, and I think the Americans are working on it. And it is very easy to segregate Iran into small states, because Iran is geographically huge, it contains many ethnic groups and its population is over 80 million. It includes Shia Arabs and Shia Persians, it includes as a minority Sunni Arabs and Sunni Persians. It has Shia and Sunni Kurds, and it has the Beluches at the far end of Iran on the Pakistani border which is called Baluchistan, it also has the Zaradashts (worshippers of fire).

In conclusion, the middle east in general will continue to experience political instability and bloodshed as long as there is no one ruler to unite Iraq or any other country experiencing something like Iraq. And in my opinion the Americans will not withdraw from Iraq for at least the coming 15 years. And not until changing the Iranian regime or having insurances from Iran which I think the Iranians will not give because the top of the list of Insurances must include the destroying of the Iranian nuclear program and stopping Hezbollah funding. and these 2 topics; Iran is not ready to let go even if it had to engage in war.

So for the coming 20 years, blood continues in the region unless malicious governments are removed by the people of the land or a rebel after ousting the colonizer and cleaning the region.